We Hear This All The Time…
“This is encouraging criminals.”
“You shouldn’t be sharing this kind of information on the internet.”
“It should be illegal to buy lockpicks.”
Whether it’s in person or a comment on Facebook, we hear this kind of talk all the time. After all, I do think it’s a natural first response for someone who has never encountered the idea of lockpicking as a mechanical puzzle, a mind and motor skill challenge, or a hobby. The truth is that our first response isn’t always the best or most logical response. Last year LockEx attended a large ComicCon event in Phoenix. It was our first time doing anything in the state of Arizona and we found that many people didn’t understand our purpose. We even encountered people we simply said, “hi” to passing by, that with one look at our “lockpicking” sign, quickly backed away saying they didn’t want anything to do with something criminal. If we were given the chance, in the most friendly way tried to explain that there was nothing illegal about what we did and that they could do it too.
A majority of the time, the people who hear these kinds of complaints or comments aren’t being illogical or even malicious. They come from a place of concern and fear. But the truth is that when we dig deeper into the issue, there is a deep flaw in the argument that lockpicking generates criminals or should be some super-secret information that only an elite group should have access to.
Criminals Don’t Pick Locks
One of the most common fears people have is that if every Joe Shmoe out there knows how to pick a lock, their neighborhood will suddenly become riddled with break-ins and thefts. The FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program doesn’t report burglaries specifically committed by lockpicking, but it does show the following data from 2010:
- 60.5% of burglaries were forcible entry
- 33.2% committed by entry through an unlocked door or window
- 6.3% were “forcible entry attempts,” or failed forcible entry attempts
*Source: https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2010/crime-in-the-u.s.-2010/property-crime/burglarymain (I know that there is some controversy regarding the UCR and it’s method of data catagorization. I do believe that for the purposes of this topic, those arguments do not impact the illustration of this topic.)
While this doesn’t exactly give us answers on how many burglaries were committed by an entry of lockpicking, it’s clear that a huge majority (93.7%) were someone break a door/window or getting lucky with an unlocked door/window. This doesn’t leave a lot of room for “criminal lockpickers.” Statistics aside, it also just doesn’t make sense that a criminal who wants your TV or jewelry, someone who is looking for a crime of opportunity, would want to run the risk of being found with “burglary tools” on them. (The term “burglary tools” is very vague and can vary from state to state.)
Think about the most common burglary tactics we hear about. A burglar will case a target neighborhood for a few weeks watching different homeowner’s habits such as regular times they are away or if they open and then forget to relock that living room window every afternoon the sun happens to be out. Another example is the burglar who approaches a front door and rings the bell. If someone answers the door, they make up an excuse needing to borrow a phone to call a tow truck. If no one answers, they will try to open the front door and hope someone forgot to lock it before leaving the house. These are both good tactics for criminals because even if a watchful eye gets suspicious and calls the police, the would-be burglar has done nothing wrong and nobody can prove they had malicious intent. Bottom line is that they leave the burglar with an out. Acting suspiciously and then having the police find lockpicking tools is the opposite of what burglars want.
If a criminal wants some free stuff, they are going to:
- want quick and easy entry
- spend as little time possible actually committing the crime
- not care if they leave behind a broken door or window (use destructive entry)
None of these things are conducive to lockpicking as an entry solution. Anybody who can pick a lock will tell you that in order to make your skill reliable, it takes time, knowledge, self-study and research, patience, and an investment in tools. Getting lucky with an unlocked door, kicking a door in, or a rock through the window are all far more probable scenarios when it comes to burglaries.
If you have ever done a workshop with us or encountered us hosting a lockpick village, you’ll know that we always inform people about “The Golden Rules of Lockpicking,” before we even allow them to touch a lock. The reason for this is because as members of the locksport community, we know that our peers who love and pick locks aren’t criminals and definitely don’t want to be seen or treated like one. (You can read more in our post, The Golden Rules of Lockpicking Explained, why practicing on practice locks is important and how it helps protect the integrity and image of the locksport community.)
The Bigger Issue
The thing that we really need to ask ourselves is how, as a society, do we handle knowledge and the rights of its people. Do we want to have a society where the method of keeping people safe is to hide knowledge? By arguing that it’s irresponsible to make knowledge about locks, how they work and how to pick them, you’re also saying that in order to keep people safe, those people shouldn’t know or understand how the locks that protect their property works or what vulnerabilities they have. This seems like a very poor solution since it renders people unable to make informative and knowledge-based decisions about their home security.
You might have heard about lock companies becoming angry with people who expose their product’s flaws or vulnerabilities online. It seems like a very lazy solution and a solution that doesn’t really care about the security that its customers depend on, to attempt for this information to be taken down or hidden. A company that truly cares about the quality of security they are supposed to be providing would take the information that is given to them, public or not, and attempt to make their product better. If there is a security flaw with a product, the solution is to make the product better by removing that flaw. Stopping information about the flaw is an attempt to cover up a symptom and not address the root of the problem.
The Bottom Line
In the end, I can’t really find any logic in saying that says hobby lockpickers are the scary and negative impact on society that they are sometimes given. Can someone use lockpicks to commit a crime? Yes, but the world isn’t so black and white. Concentrating on “what ifs” and not focusing on improvements based on data and knowledge creates a world far too chaotic and fear-based for my preference. People often fear and attempt to rid of something they don’t know or understand. The only remedy for this is to speak up and to keep sharing knowledge. LockEx, as often as possible, in a friendly and polite way tries to explain the points that I’ve brought up in this post and hopes to help more people understand our purpose and interests.
A very effective and positive stance you can take is to actually know the laws in your area. Lockpicking is mostly governed by state laws, so they vary depending on where you are, but knowing the law is a very powerful thing. If you’d like to find out more about the laws that surround lockpicking, you can read our article, “Is Lockpicking Legal?”
For other further reading, check out this article by Uncensored Tactical called, “Defending Open Source Lock Picking Etc,” which gives more great highlights and insights.
Have you ever encountered someone who made comments about hobby pickers? What was your reaction? Let us know in the comments section; we’d love to hear your stories!
Christine & the LockEx Team